HM Pestel - 622 Words

Political*Being a Swedish based company means Hamp;M have to follow Swedish legislation. * Like many other brand stores, Hamp;M’s stock is produced overseas. This is because of minimum wage laws which prevent workers in the UK working for below anything else. Employing workers in less developed countries mean Hamp;M can maximise their profits. *Price of cotton has increased rapidly as supplies are becoming limited. Hamp;M promote basic cotton ranges therefore they use mass amounts of cotton. If cotton prices do not start to fall, Hamp;M will have to increase their prices to maximise profits, which will draw away possible consumers that shop there to take advantage of their inexpensive clothing. | Economical *Hamp;M are known for†¦show more content†¦| Technological*Hamp;M have recently introduced an online shopping website. This is beneficial to those with children at home or who work long hours and do not necessarily have time to go shopping.*Hamp;M is known for fast fashion and averagely takes 12 weeks to get their clothes from the designing stage into their store. Advanced printing machines are used to mass produce yet keep their high quality of clothing.*Hamp;M’s website promotes their company through weekly newsletters and trend blogs. This is appealing to those who want to dress fashionable but are unsure what trends go together. They also advertise events and special offers on their website. This promotes their store to the segment of consumers that shop online and have an email network. | Legal*Like many high street store, Hamp;M have had accusations that they employ underage workers in illegal sweatshop factories. The poor working conditions and small wages put many consumers off of purchasing their clothes as they do not want to promote this work. Hamp;M sponsor charities to help raise awareness of this.*The Sales of Good Act is the only legislation that protects consumers from companies. Hamp;M have a returns policy that is clear and states the consumer is entitled to a full refund or exchange within the allocated time and within a resalable, unless faulty, condition. | Environmental*Hamp;M have an OrganicShow MoreRelatedHM Swot and Pestel2208 Words   |  9 PagesTwitter Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Description of the Organisation 4 PESTEL-Analysis 6 SWOT-Analysis 7 * Strengths 7 * Weaknesses 9 * Opportunities 9 * Threats 10 Ethical behaviour and corporate social responsibility 11 Conclusion 12 Bibliography 13 Executive Summary HM is a great company in many aspects. It may be Sweden’s most recognised company after IKEA. It all startedRead MorePestel for HM in China5292 Words   |  22 PagesPESTEL China 1. Politics Today’s China is the most populous country in the world and is so one of the most important political and economical forces in the world. 1.1. Country name In English China is official called â€Å"People’s Republic of China† https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html and in Chinese â€Å"Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo† https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html. 1.2. Capital The capital of China is Beijing, which is locatedRead MoreHM Analysis1227 Words   |  5 PagesAB (HM). We will analyse on it using PESTEL, Porter’s Five Forces and SWOT to get a clear concept of what HM is today and where it can go. This positioning will be helpful in strategy designing. Company activities HM was established in Và ¤sterà ¥s, Sweden in 1947 by Erling Persson. We now sell clothes and cosmetics in around 2.200 stores around the world. * HM offers fashion and quality at the best price * HM offers fashion for women, men,teenagers and children. * HM alsoRead MoreCase Study: HM in Fast Fashion: Continued Success. Essay3141 Words   |  13 PagesTitle: Case Study: HM in Fast Fashion: Continued Success. Word count:2638 Abstract This report contains the analysis of value and culture of reputable apparel retailer HM, as well as three analysis method, which is PETEL, Porter’s five forces, and VRIO framework, to analyse the external influence factors, competitors, and competitive advantages of HM. Three new potential strategies are tested by using the model of Johnson and Scholes, and one proper strategy willRead MoreHow Mergers And Acquisition Affect Financial Performance1170 Words   |  5 PagesStudent Name: Wenqing Gu Student ID: 201114686 Title: Can company create value through MA in technology industry? Research area – according to different data btw acquiring firms and target firms to analysis their company value changes before after in disclosure date. Company choiceï ¼Å¡ Cisco system Inc, Lenovo Group Ltd, Microsoft Corporation Objectives The report will focus on analysis what kind of impact will affect companies’ financial performance and its value through companies’ mergersRead MoreH M : The World s Third Biggest Fashion Retailer979 Words   |  4 PagesHM Introduction HM is the world’s second-biggest fashion retailer which first store opened in Vasteras, Sweden in 1947(ThisisMoney, 2015). This essay will demonstrate in terms of the Porter’s â€Å"Five Forces of competition Analysis† with the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis and a briefly recommendation. These factors will discuss in turn. The PESTEL analysis will be append in this essay. Five Forces of Competition Analysis The Threat of Entry As the suppliers are easyRead MoreStrategy Management983 Words   |  4 PagesModel for CRH Strategy literature offers many techniques and models suited for systematic strategic analysis. The SWOT analysis, the PESTEL analysis, the Five Forces analysis framework are the prime examples of techniques that can be adopted for strategic analysis. This assignment will use PESTEL and Five forces model to analysis the environment of CRH plc. PESTEL analysis is to identify and analyze the strategy and business environment, it is stand for Political, Economic, Social, TechnologicalRead Moreheypih Essay2506 Words   |  11 PagesMMM365 T2 2014 HM Individual Case Analysis Word count: 2393 Q1. What do you think is the most critical strategic issue confronting HM? Explain your answer by drawing on relevant topics in Strategic Management The most critical strategic issue that HM needs to confront is the declining market position in relation to the rapid expansion of Zara and other fashion retailers. Hennes and Maurtiz, or also known for short as HM, is a big billion dollar Swedish fashionRead MoreA Short Note On Individual Marketing Pl H M1761 Words   |  8 PagesSubmission Date December 22nd, 2015 Executive Summary HM is one of the most popular worldwide fashion clothing company that attempting for sustained brand awareness, market share and income growth. This report will practice the justification behind this statement, including the company’s current situation within Thailand clothing industry and current trends by using various difference tools such as PESTEL, Porter’s 5 Forces, and SWOT. This will then show a detailed marketing strategyRead MoreThe Rise Of E Commerce1440 Words   |  6 Pagesmarket in Asia for HM and CA. On 1964 the first Hennes store outside Sweden open in Norway, on 1978 the first store outside Scandinavia opens in London, in the UK, on 1990s progress continues in Europe with the opening of the first store in France in 1998.Newspapre and magazine advertising is complemented by outdoor advertising featuring famous models .on 2007 the first Asian stores open in Hong Kong and Shanghai. On 2009 the new store in Beijing of HM was finally opened. So far, HM has opened 14

Beaver Brothers Case Study - 1424 Words

Summary Beaver Brothers, Inc. is conducting a study to assess the accuracy, and consistency of their 150-gram bar soap production line. They are interested in seeking; the reliability, average weight and range of each soap bar. By conducting this study Beaver Brothers, Inc. wants to see the consistency of their machines, dependability of their marketing tools and the level of assurance that they are promoting and supplying trustworthy products to their consumers. Beaver Brother, Inc. achieves their wanted information by collecting 25 samples of 5 observations and recorded the data in a table. The task is to use these collected samples to create; means, graphs, and tables to present the data and draw conclusions about the production†¦show more content†¦The greater the Cp and the closer the Cpk is to the Cp, indicates a higher level of working capacity. These values can be calculated using the Process Capability module on the POM software. Parameter Value Results Value Upper tolerance limit 170 Process capability index 0.08 The actual process capability is Cpk = -0.08 Lower tolerance limit 162 Upper one sided index 0.8392 The potential process capability is Cp = 0.4596 Mean (optional) 162.6959 Lower one sided index 0.08 Standard deviation 2.9012 Table 1 shows the factors used in finding out the actual results of; Cp, and Cpk from the initial study. With a suggested Cp of 1.33 to demonstrate that the production line is well centered, and working at a high rate, you can see that the initial results do not suggest this. The Cp is well below the recommended index at 0.4596, suggesting that the process needs to be altered to make improvements. It is also visible that the Cpk (0.08) has a much less number in comparison to the Cp. This implies that this process is not working to its full potential. Consequently it is necessary that Beaver Brothers, Inc makes further improvements to create a more centered, higher potential productivity rate. c) After improvements, and collecting more samples the results of the Cp and Cpk are as follows: Parameter Value Results Value Upper tolerance limitShow MoreRelatedAdvance Problem #301422 Words   |  6 PagesSummary Beaver Brothers, Inc. is conducting a study to assess the accuracy, and consistency of their 150-gram bar soap production line. They are interested in seeking; the reliability, average weight and range of each soap bar. By conducting this study Beaver Brothers, Inc. wants to see the consistency of their machines, dependability of their marketing tools and the level of assurance that they are promoting and supplying trustworthy products to their consumers. Beaver Brother, Inc. achieves theirRead More The Evolution of the American Television Family Essay1151 Words   |  5 PagesThe Evolution of the American Television Family Television is not just a form of entertainment, but it is an excellent form of study of society’s view concerning its families. This study focuses on the history of television beginning in the early 1950s and will run through present day. It examines the use of racial, ethnic and sexual stereotypes to characterize the players of these shows. The examples assist in tracing what has happened to the depiction of the American family on prime timeRead MoreMedia Changes The World For The Worst1565 Words   |  7 Pageseither emotional or academic problems, or both. My own research indicates that boys, especially, suffer from these transitions, says Kay S. Hymowitz. After parents are split up, there may come a time when another parental unit comes into play, but studies show that a new parent often makes things worse. Not only does separation cause anxiety, it may also crush the child s view on relationships. When a child witnesses their parents marriage crumbling, it s possib le that she may adapt a pessimisticRead MoreThe Role Of The Father Has Changed Today s Society964 Words   |  4 Pagescare and housework, though women still do the majority, according to a Pew Research study released in March. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 24 million children in America- one out of every three—live in biological father-absent homes. Nine in ten American parents this is a â€Å"crisis† (National Fatherhood Initiative, 2014. This information is the opposite of what was shown in TV shows such as Leave it to Beaver and Good Times where the father was present and active in their children’s life. TodayRead MoreBeaver Wars and the Relationship between Europeans and American Indians2919 Words   |  12 Pagesï » ¿The Beaver Wars and the European/American Indian Relationship Introduction Genocide is not a feature of warfare or rule that can be unilaterally blamed on European nations. It was a natural outgrowth of a peoples desire to devastate another group of people for some purpose such as to steal land or gain an economic advantage. The Europeans who sailed to North America were skilled in this particular form of warfare having practiced it on one another for centuries, but they did not have to introduceRead More Family Life: The Importance of Parental Relationships Essay3194 Words   |  13 Pageswhen the parents are happily married and remain together, the family and relationships can be dysfunctional. Sometimes, parental involvement can create chaos and complete crises. In Normal Family Processes, W. Robert Beavers and Robert B. Hampson explore the spectrum of families. Beavers and Hampson conclude that â€Å"[i]n these [dysfunctional] families and individuals, a basic developmental task, that of evolving trust, has been aborted and remains unfinished† (89). Because of a lack of family rules andRead MoreThe Mystery Of Church793 Words   |  4 Pagesfunctions, revivals, and other social events, all added to the motivation of why my Dad loved entertaining and all and sundry loved Mr. Alfred and his guitar. Nevertheless, even though my Dad came from a sizeable, extremely religious family, (eighteen brothers and sisters that appeared highly respected), he somewhat walked on the wild side or insistently in the middle of the road. Due to his early musical training, helped program him on a lingering road amusing others with his talent; for in the army duringRead More A Sociological view of Divorce Essays4317 Words   |  18 PagesCleavers. Wise and wonderful Ward. A pal as well as a Dad. June. The perfect wife and mother. Big brother Wally. Popular, smart and athletic – one tough act to follow. And last but definitely not least, hapless, irrepressible Theodore, a.k.a. â€Å"the Beaver,† just a regular kid trying his best to stay out of trouble while finding a thousand ways to place himself at trouble’s doorstep. Leave it to Beaver. It was the television hit in the ‘60s that hallmarked the phrase, â€Å" The American Family† and madeRead MoreThe Past And Present Defining Characteristics Of The Sami Peoples1712 Words   |  7 Pagessome cases, loss of community. It is important to evaluate both the past and present defining characteristics of the Sami peoples to fully understand their culture. One of the most well known characterisitics of the Sami is their skill in reindeer pastoralism. Though, pastoralism was not their initial mode of substiance, instead, the Sami began as a hunter gatherer society. As northern Europe is subject to extreme and lengthy winters, the Sami caught and harvested what they could. Beaver, reindeerRead MoreMass Media And Reflection Of Society2345 Words   |  10 Pagesfamily members. Looking at the father who served roles as the sole provider, authoritarian and wise counselor for his wife and children exemplified by TV dads such as Ward Cleaver, played by Hugh Beaumont, on the 50 s television show â€Å"Leave It To Beaver†. Over the next sixty years or so, father’s roles would change as the structure of the family continued its transformation. In a review of the book, The Sitcom Reader: America Viewed and Skewed, Choice magazine cited the sitcom as a window into

Qar Reading Strategy Free Essays

Grade Level(s)| K-3| When? | Literary Focus| Before| Fluency| During| Comprehension| After| Vocabulary| | Writing| | Oral Language| Q. A. R. We will write a custom essay sample on Qar Reading Strategy or any similar topic only for you Order Now (Question-Answer-Relationships) Question-Answer Relationships, or QAR, is a reading comprehension strategy developed to aid in the approach that students take when reading texts and answering questions about that text. Students learn to categorize types of questions which in turn help them know where to find information. It encourages students to be active, strategic readers of texts. QAR  outlines  where information can be found â€Å"In the Text† or â€Å"In my Head. It then breaks down the actual question-answer relationships into four types: Right There, Think and Search, Author and Me, and On My Own. (Fisher, D. , Brozo, W. G. , Frey, N. , Ivey, G, 2011, pg. 81) STEP-BY-STEP and EXAMPLE Chosen text: Frog and Toad Together, by Arnold Lobel 1. Hook/Engagement–Begin by reviewing what students have already learned about how to ask questions as a way to understand the meaning of texts. For example using this reading asks them to talk about the kinds of questions they can ask before, during, and after reading. Next, introduce the idea that there are two kinds of questions you can ask about texts. Explain to students that an â€Å"In the Text† question is a question that students can find the answer to by looking in the book that they are reading. An â€Å"In My Head† question is a question that requires students to think about what their own knowledge is to answer the question. Review a book that you have recently read aloud with students. Write the example below on a piece of chart paper or on the blackboard. Choose a few â€Å"In the Text† and â€Å"In My Head† questions about the book that obviously belong to one category or the other, and have students tell you in which column to write the question. When you give students a literal question, have them show you where they found the answer in the book. When you ask them an â€Å"In My Head† question, go through the book with them and show them that they couldn’t find the answer in the book. Have them give answers to the â€Å"In My Head† questions and explain how they answered them ( thinking about what they have learned that is not in the book). Here are some examples of the two types: â€Å"In the Text† questions| â€Å"In my Head† questions| What is the title of the book? What is the author’s name? How long is the book? | Do I like the title? Have I read any other books by this author? How long will it take me to read this book? | Explain that they are going to learn more and ask these types of questions about a new book you are going to read together. 2. Measurable Objectives–Explain that you are going to read the first three chapters of Frog and Toad Together aloud to them, and they are going to help you make a list of â€Å"In the Text† and â€Å"In My Head† questions. Then, they are going to help you answer the questions and see how these types of questions will help them to understand the story. 3. Focused Instruction–Review with students the four types of questions explained in the QAR Strategy. Explain that there are two types of â€Å"In the Text† questions and two types of â€Å"In My Head† questions. Draw a copy of the QAR table on chart paper or on the blackboard or use an overhead projector. The table should look something like this: â€Å"In the Text† questions| â€Å"In My Head† questions| Right There| Think and Search| Author and Me| On my Own| Read the first chapter, â€Å"A List,† from Frog and Toad Together aloud to students. Next, write the questions listed below under the â€Å"Right There† heading. Read the questions aloud, look through the chapter, show the students where you found the answer, and then think aloud the answer. . Right There i. What is the first thing Toad writes on his list? â€Å"When I turn to page 4, I see that the first thing Toad writes on his list is ‘Wake up. ‘† ii. Who is the friend Toad goes to see? â€Å"When I turn to page 9, I see that Toad goes to see Frog. † Next , write these questions under the â€Å"Think and Search† heading. Read the questions aloud and then think aloud the answers. b. Think and Search iii. What caused Toad to forget what was on his list? â€Å"I read that Toad’s list blew away and Frog did not catch it, so that is why Toad couldn’t remember what was on his list. iv. How did Toad finally remember what was the last thing on his list was? â€Å"Frog reminded Toad that it was getting dark and they should be going to sleep – the last thing on Toad’s list. † Next, write these questions under the â€Å"Author and Me† heading. Read the questions aloud and then think aloud the answers. c. Author and Me v. What do you think of Toad’s list? â€Å"I think that writing a list of things to do is a good idea. But, Toad could have left off some things, like waking up or getting dressed, because he doesn’t need to be reminded to do that. † vi. Did you agree with the reason Toad gives for not chasing after his list? â€Å"No. I think that he should have chased after his list, even if it that wasn’t one of the things on his list. He couldn’t have written that on his list anyway because he didn’t know the list would blow away. † Next, write these questions under the â€Å"On My Own† heading. Read the questions aloud and then think aloud the answers. d. On My Own vii. Have you or somebody in your family even written a list of things to do? â€Å"Yes. I have written a list of things that I have to do on a weekend day because that is not like a school day. On weekends, I do lots of different things, so I have to write a list to remind myself of all the things I have to do. † viii. What would you do if you lost your to-do list and couldn’t find it? â€Å"I would look for it for a while and if I couldn’t find it, I’d write a new list of things to do. † 4. This would be followed up with guided practice, independent practice, assessment, and the reflecting/planning. References Fisher, D. , Brozo, W. G. , Frey, N. , Ivey, Gay. (2011). 50 Instructional Routines to Develop Content Literacy. Boston:Pearson. How to cite Qar Reading Strategy, Essay examples

The Pequot War free essay sample

Furthermore, an alternative hypothesis is given in which English authorities’ eagerness was the chief cause for intertribal warfare. |(no detected biases) | |Puritans and Pequots: The Question Of Genocide ( Primary Source: The New England Quarterly, Volume 68, No2, page 278-293 ) (Paper) |Michael Freeman |Feb 4, 2005 |The paper is author’s â€Å"genocide† concept analysis and a interpretive concern whether Puritans committed genocide against the Pequots or not. (no detected biases) | |A True Relation Of The Late Battell Fought In New England, Between The English And The Salvages: With The Present State Of Things There (Book) |Philip Vincent |unknown |The book is a synopsis account of the crucial engagement of the Pequot war, which occurred 6 months after the Mystic Massacre. |He proudly indicated that English was the first â€Å"discoverers† of the New World, which was settled by Native Americans thousands of years ago. Another â€Å"superior race† biased ideology. He claimed New England’s land could only be fertile by â€Å"industrious hands. (no detected biases) | |A True Relation Of The Late Battell Fought In New England, Between The English And The Salvages: With The Present State Of Things There (Book) |Philip Vincent |unknown |The book is a synopsis account of the crucial engagement of the Pequot war, which occurred 6 months after the Mystic Massacre. |He proudly indicated that English was the first â€Å"discoverers† of the New World, which was settled by Native Americans thousands of years ago. Another â€Å"superior race† biased ideology. He claimed New England’s land could only be fertile by â€Å"industrious hands. † | |Battle Of Mystic Fort (Woodcut) |John Underhill |unknown |The wood cut is a bird-eye, general view depiction of the Battle of Mystic Fort in 1637. |(no detected biases) | | SOURCE ANALYSIS First of all, Michael Freeman’s â€Å"Puritans and Pequots: The Question of Genocide† is examined as an informative source for this aspect of United States history. There are two crucial themes the author pointed out in the article: conflict’s importance and how it’s related to the term â€Å"genocide†. Firstly, there were four fundamental reasons for the conflict between European settlers and native people. The first large-scale chief cause for its cruciality is the first violent confrontation between the English colonists in New England against indigenous people. Additionally, this is also considered as the first violent encounter between the Puritans and native Americans. Moreover, the mentioned incident could be seen as an episode in the history of United States of America’s establishment. Ultimately, the Pequot event is a typical instance of inter-ethnic violence between colonial settlers and autochthonous people. Furthermore, the term genocide ( which was coined in the World War II period of time by Raphael Lemkin, ) means a political crime for deliberately devastating an ethnic group or a nation in large-scale circumstances, which was proclaimed by Freeman to determine the comparison between the Puritans’ Pequot campaign to attack Indians’ village and the concept genocide nowadays. Now, lets take a look at Cramer’s â€Å"The Pequot War Another View†. The author provided us with a reliable history detail that there was a serious disadvantage in identifying the truth for the Pequot war, that is, we are all dependent on English and Dutch written records. And obviously, this one-side incident documentaries from these parties could be possibly interest in their action justification. Furthermore, we could not also eliminate these remnants and rely only on archeological evidences, which are inadequate and inaccurate. This handicapped fact plays an essential role in Pequot war analysis process as well as hypothesis to explain. As an overview, Cramer’s paper did a good job on providing vital theories to explain the incident then and now, which is a complement to Freeman’s article about the conflict importances we discussed before. The first most popular theory for Pequot war’s motivation is â€Å"just war† ideology by the Puritans. More specifically, by assertion of â€Å"fierce, cruel, and warlike People than the Rest of the Indians† and the death of Captain John Stone by a Pequot warrior, it was a serious necessity for European colonists to assault Pequot stronghold at all cost. The later theory in mid nineteenth theory was aimed to claim that it was a savagely, aggressive action of English colonists to fight back the Pequot Indians. In addition, the colonists had already taken advantages of the hostilities and conflicts between Indians tribes to start out the war. The most recently theory was given in 1960s pointed out that the profoundly cause for the assault due to the desire of English authorities, especially Massachusetts, to expand their trade routes with Indians tribes. The last useful information about Pequot war Cramer brought into his paper was the cast of Pequot drama. On the side of colonists’ governments, we had Massachusetts Bay and Plymouth colony, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. On the indigenous’ side, there were also four significant Indians tribes, namely, Narragansett, Niantic, Mohegan, and the Block Islanders. The third sources i would like to mention is the popular book by John Mason A Brief History Of The Pequot War and â€Å"A True Relation Of The Late Battell Fought In New England, Between The English And The Salvages: With The Present State Of Things There† by Philip Vincent. Both were literally books that were written by the contemporary period of time. The first thing that surprised the readers was the old English writing style and aged english words by the authors, which could be somehow a barrier for spectators to understand and follow the flows of story-telling style. The information was mostly the authors’ feelings and tellings about the events from stem to stern: from New England depicting to the inside causes of Pequot war. PAPER â€Å"It was a great ball game and everybody participated. Pequot is a good ball club and they beat us earlier. This was probably the best game we played all year. Im proud of the girls really proud of them. † (Harold Chitwood) Pequot war was a violent conflict between English colonists and their Native American allies against another indigenous tribe called Pequot, which occurred in the years from 1637 to 1638. For the most considerings, the Pequot war was described as one of the most first sanguinary warfare that took place in America. Additionally, this bloody conflict could be considered as an essential episode in United States of America’s history. This paper is aimed to break down the Pequot war from soup to nuts, which starts with the Pequot tribe’s origin, the battle’s causes, participants, battle development process, and eventually the aftermath of the incident. Foremost, a closer look at Pequot people and their dawn of settlement are analyzed in order to understand more insightful about the Pequot war. Pequot people were a Native American ethnic group , who occupied in American eastern region nowadays called Connecticut, in roughly 17th century. While many historians believed that the Pequots migrated to central and south Connecticut from upper Hudson River in early 16th century, some debated that they were Connecticut indigenous residents for thousands of years. They were considerably dominant in economics, military as well as political establishment; their population varied around 16,000, which was the most densely inhabitance tribe in New England. After the dreadful epidemic in 1633, came along with the Pequot war, their population significantly decreased to only approximately 3,000 people. Nowadays, there are only two Pequot communities in Connecticut, which are legally acknowledged by the United States, namely, Mashantucket Pequot Tribe Of Connecticut and Eastern Pequot Tribal Nation. (1) Before interpreting the Pequot war, lets remind ourselves the era of conquest to New World of Europeans. By the late 15th century, with advantages in new technologies as well as population growth and government supports, many European superior nations includes England, Netherlands, Spain, and French started their voyages across Atlantic to New World. They made contact with indigenous people for mutual beneficial relationships through trading. Time by time, trading with europeans had become a crucial role in many Native American tribes, Pequot was not an exception. Before the inception of the war, the effort to dominate fur trade with europeans, a political division between Pequot and Mohegan occurred, which resulted in different trading alliance: Mohegan with the English and Pequot with the Dutch. Tensions were sparked between the Pequots and other Indians tribes due to a series of fur trading-related contemporary incidents. (2) Next, the causes for Pequot war are broke down. There is a large pool of assumptions and ideas for the causes of Pequot war, some are biases, others may not be reliable. Regarding to many historians and documentaries, there are three fundamental theories for the Pequot war to broke out by Clayton E. Cramer’s The Pequot War Another View article. First of all, the oldest theory claimed that Pequot’s actions was the chief motivation for the conflict. As mentioned before, the Dutch was primary trade subject of Pequot tribe, as an retaliation for the death of their sachem, Tatobem, who was kidnapped for ransom by the Dutch during a vessel trade, the Pequot assaulted and murdered an English captain, John Stone and seven of his crew with unawareness about the nationality of John Stone, mistook him with an Dutch businessman. By the assertion of Pequot people, who were fierce, cruel, and warlike, the death of Captain John Stone was a pedal for English colonists to burn down their fortification at Mystic, which will be discussed later in this paper. In 1856, a contrary theory was given by many historians, which asserted that the English colonists’ authorities was driving force for the violent encounter. More specifically, the English took advantages of profoundly tensions between the Pequots and other Indians’ tribes to deploy the raid campaign. Nonetheless, Europeans’ Native American tribes alliance was basically an passive factor. Ultimately, the most recently hypothesis as well as the most modern one believed that the English colonists desired to occupy Pequot land to expand their favorable trading process and political domination over New England. As easily observation, we can see all above three debated theories both have a acceleration force by the English colonizers, the authorities wanted to show off their civilization dominance over the Indians, as a proof for the biassed expression: â€Å"superior race† at the first days they came to New World. 3) Furthermore, participants in the drama of Pequot war also played a significant role in the battle as a general view. First of all, on the side of the English settlers, we have Massachusetts Bay colony, which was run by John Winthrop and Sir Henry Vane in separated intervals; Plymouth colony whose governors Edward Winslow and William Bradford; Thomas Hooker in Connecticut and finally Roger Williams’ Rhode Island. In addition, Captain John Mason and John Underhill, who were military commanders were also important figures on the assault of Fort Mystic. Secondly, notable Indians tribe were the Pequots, the Mohegan, the Niantics, and the Narragansett came along with many indispensable Indians characters, namely, Sassacus, Pequot’ sachem, Uncas, the sachem of the Mohegan, Miantonomo Narragansett’s prominent sachem, and Wequash, sagamore of the Niantics. Above listed participants are divided into two sides, the first side is English colonists with their allies the Mohegan and the Narragansett. On the opposite party, the Pequot allied with the Niantics to fight against the colonists and their traditional enemies. (4) Now, lets examine step-by-step development of the Pequot war, which is divided into three important stages: Block Island incident, the Pequot’s raid, and the Mystic Massacre. Afterwards the incident of John Stone’s death, the dead-alone case of John Oldham in his pinnace, Block Island, was considerably a accelerator for the inception of Pequot war. By the founded evidence, Narragansett and Block Island native people were accused for the death of Mr. Oldham. Subsequently, Miantomono the supreme sachem of Narragansett returned Oldham’s two sons and his properties as appeasement and raised an army of roughly two hundred warriors to Block Island for vengeance on behalf of Massachusetts. To seek for their own revenge, John Endicott and approximately ninety men were commissioned by Massachusetts’ authorities to strike Block Island, burned down their enemies’ crops, canoes, and shelters. Later on, Commander John Edicott decided to chase down the Pequots to retaliate for the death of Captain John Stone and John Oldham but he failed to engage and sailed back home to Boston. (5) â€Å"They had commission to put to death the men of Block Island, but to spare the women and children, and to bring them away, and to take possession of the island, and from then to go to the Pequots to demand the murderers of Captain Stone and other English † (John Winthrop, Massachusetts’ governor) The second stage of the war was the wrath of the Pequots and their raids. While Massachusetts cooperated with Mohegan and Narragansett as there allies to fight against the Pequots, who were in a preparation to enhance their military strength by recruiting 36 tributary villages and western Niantics. On April, 1637, the Pequots stroke Wethersfield as an recrimination, which was asked by Sowheag who was dispossessed sachem by the settlers of Wethersfield. Six men and three women were murdered, two young girls were kidnapped, possessions were destroyed. As a climax, general Court of Connecticut claimed war against the Pequots a week after the raid event. The governor of Connecticut summoned Captain John Mason and ninety English militia, who were supported by seventy Mohegan’ soldiers under the command of their paramount sachem, Uncas. At Fort Saybrook, Captain John Mason’s army joined with Captain John Underhill and his twenty men. The plan of the troop was to sail from Fort Saybrook to Narragansett Bay and then land at Fort Mystic to prepare for a surprise attack on the Pequots’ village before dawn. (6) â€Å"We had formerly concluded to destroy them by the sword and save the plunder. † (Captain John Mason) The last stage of the warfare was the bloody Mystic Massacre. Sassacus, Pequot’ sachem, believed English sailed back to Boston, recruited a army of hundreds of men in order to strike Hartford. Thus, the remaining of the Pequots’ villagers were mostly women, children, and elders. The attack took place in 26 May, 1637, with an altogether ground forces of more than 400 men, Captain John Mason commanded English militia to attack the interior of the village, set the wigwams on fire, their Native Americans’ allies supported the English by the exterior. Roughly 600 to 700 Pequots inhabitants were killed, everyone who tried to climb over the palisade were murdered by the English militia or Indians allies, a small number of Pequots escaped to the woods or were captured as prisoners. Later on, after witnessing the terrifying destructions of their homeland in Mystic, group of Pequots’ men attempted to chase down the English, who had already returned to their home with their Indians’ allies, but failed to do so. The mission was accomplished by Captain John Mason, who justified his missions by the desire of God to punish a fierce, cruel, aggressive race. 7) As an aftermath of the Pequot war, the Treaty of Hartford was considered as a disposition agreement on Pequots’ lands between Indians’ tribes the Mohegans and Narragansetts and English’s Connecticut General Court. On the Pequots’ survivors side, many of them failed to find new shelters in neighborhood Indians’ tribe and eventually gave up their hope by selling themselves as slaves to Bermuda or West Indies, others were offered as households servants for English in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Since the Mystics Massacre, a long-term peace lasted between Indians and colonists because many indigenous people were too frightened to fight against the foreign settlers. (8) In conclusion, it’s not excessive to claim that Pequot war was one of the most dreadful battle inn the early history page of the United States of America, the first violent encounter between Puritans and Native American, it was also considered as an inter-ethnic violence, which was related by the term â€Å"genocide† by Michael Freeman’s book. This paper is built based on useful and diverse information of multiple analyzed sources, Cramer provided us with causes and participants of the warfare, Freeman complemented with many battle development stages while two other books from Captain John Mason and Phillip Vincent provided with detail descriptions and popular quoting in the battle segments of the paper.